Contradicting widespread fears of technology-induced “brain rot,” a groundbreaking study reveals that people who regularly use digital devices actually experience significantly better cognitive health as they age.
The comprehensive meta-analysis, published in Nature Human Behaviour by neuroscientists from Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, examined data from over 400,000 adults across 136 studies to deliver a surprising conclusion: digital technology use is associated with a remarkable 58% lower risk of cognitive impairment.
“You can flip on the news on just about any day and you’ll see people talking about how technologies are harming us,” said Dr. Michael K. Scullin, associate professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor University and co-author of the study. “People often use the terms ‘brain drain’ and ‘brain rot,’ and now digital dementia is an emerging phrase. As researchers, we wanted to know if this was true.”
The research directly challenges the popular “digital dementia” hypothesis, which predicts that prolonged exposure to digital technology worsens cognitive abilities. Instead, the findings strongly support what researchers call the “technological reserve” hypothesis – that digital engagement actually fosters cognitive resilience in older adults.
This protective effect remained strong even after controlling for factors like socioeconomic status, education, age, gender, baseline cognitive ability, social support, overall health, and engagement with other mentally stimulating activities like reading.
Dr. Scullin noted that while many people associate technology use with being mentally and physically sedentary, the opposite may be true, especially for the generation that first encountered computers and the internet as adults.
“One of the first things that middle-age and older adults were saying is that ‘I’m so frustrated by this computer. This is hard to learn.’ That’s actually a reflection of the cognitive challenge, which may be beneficial for the brain even if it doesn’t feel great in the moment,” Dr. Scullin explained.
The researchers identified several possible mechanisms behind technology’s cognitive benefits. Digital devices require constant adaptation to new software updates, troubleshooting connection issues, and filtering out distractions – all of which exercise cognitive abilities.
“If you’re doing that for years and you’re really engaging with it, even though you might experience frustration, that may be a sign of you exercising your brain,” said Dr. Scullin.
Technology also enhances social connectivity, which is crucial for brain health. “Now you can connect with families across generations,” Dr. Scullin noted. “You not only can talk to them, you can see them. You can share pictures. You can exchange emails and it’s all within a second or less. So that means there’s a greater opportunity for decreasing loneliness.”
A third protective factor is what researchers call “digital scaffolding” – the way technologies like digital reminders, GPS navigation, and online banking allow older adults to maintain independence despite minor cognitive difficulties.
The findings are particularly significant as they come from studying “digital pioneers” – the first generation to engage with computers and the internet as adults, who have now reached the age where dementia risks emerge.
The magnitude of technology’s protective effect rivals or exceeds other well-established factors known to reduce dementia risk, including physical activity, blood pressure management, and higher educational attainment.
For family members of technology-hesitant older adults, Dr. Scullin offers practical advice: “If you have a parent or grandparent who’s just staying away from technology, maybe revisit that. Could they learn to use photo, messaging, or calendar apps on a smartphone or tablet? Start simple and be very patient while they learn.”
The research suggests that while concerns about excessive social media use and screen time in young people may be warranted, the overall impact of digital technology on cognitive aging since the 1990s has been overwhelmingly positive.
“We could spend a long time talking about all the specific ways in which technology use can be bad,” Dr. Scullin acknowledged. “However, the net effect since the 1990s has been positive for overall cognition in older adults.”
If our reporting has informed or inspired you, please consider making a donation. Every contribution, no matter the size, empowers us to continue delivering accurate, engaging, and trustworthy science and medical news. Independent journalism requires time, effort, and resources—your support ensures we can keep uncovering the stories that matter most to you.
Join us in making knowledge accessible and impactful. Thank you for standing with us!
